Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,054,623 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.217% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 216.6 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,089 compared to $128,140, a difference of 21.9%), median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $49,818, a difference of 19.3%), and median household income ($94,091 compared to $111,519, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $71,567, a difference of 7.4%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 12.5%), and per capita income ($49,893 compared to $56,709, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 22.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 21.8%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.36%), receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 26.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 28.9%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.3% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 0.75%), currently married (49.3% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.93%), and family households (64.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 35.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 65.9%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.0%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 44.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.60%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.0%).