Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Lithuania

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Exceptional
Good
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,762,060 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 26.9 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,149 compared to $128,140, a difference of 18.5%), median household income ($96,836 compared to $111,519, a difference of 15.2%), and median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $49,818, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $71,567, a difference of 8.3%), per capita income ($51,361 compared to $56,709, a difference of 10.4%), and median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $70,146, a difference of 10.7%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Hong Kong
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,361
Exceptional
$56,709
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$118,053
Exceptional
$131,067
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,836
Exceptional
$111,519
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,769
Exceptional
$59,433
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,346
Exceptional
$70,146
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,317
Exceptional
$49,818
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,028
Exceptional
$62,083
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,149
Exceptional
$128,140
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$114,336
Exceptional
$127,500
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,087
Exceptional
$71,567
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.6%
Good
25.5%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 17.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.23%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and poverty (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.57%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Hong Kong
Poverty
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.4%
Exceptional
17.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Exceptional
12.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Exceptional
12.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.8%
Exceptional
16.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.2%
Exceptional
24.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.1%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Hong Kong
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.20%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Hong Kong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Exceptional
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.2%
Tragic
30.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
71.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Exceptional
83.6%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 17.7%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.10%), married-couple households (48.6% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Hong Kong
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
66.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.6%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
23.6%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 6.2%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Tragic
11.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.8%
Tragic
52.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Fair
19.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Good
6.5%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 60.0%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.6%), and professional degree (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (70.3% compared to 71.0%, a difference of 1.0%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Tragic
94.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.1%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Average
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Exceptional
71.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.4%
Exceptional
55.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.6%
Exceptional
48.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.8%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 33.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Hong Kong
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
19.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.9%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%