Navajo vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,587,868 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.683. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 2.2 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $56,709, a difference of 95.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($66,529 compared to $128,140, a difference of 92.6%), and median household income ($59,159 compared to $111,519, a difference of 88.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 14.2%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $62,083, a difference of 46.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($47,722 compared to $71,567, a difference of 50.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (18.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 159.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (31.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 154.1%), and married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 151.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 50.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 57.6%), and single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 65.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 133.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 112.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 109.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 118.4%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 82.9%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 74.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.35%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.65 compared to 3.26, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.9%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 123.1%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 116.9%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 105.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.25%), 8th grade (95.3% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 88.9%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 74.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 74.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 17.1%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.8%), and disability age over 75 (58.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 25.4%).