Immigrants from Bolivia vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,811,367 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Bolivia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.049. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bolivia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bolivia corresponds to an increase of 5.1 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bolivia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,128 compared to $128,140, a difference of 18.5%), median male earnings ($60,088 compared to $70,146, a difference of 16.7%), and per capita income ($48,970 compared to $56,709, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 1.9%), householder income over 65 years ($73,434 compared to $71,567, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($59,389 compared to $62,083, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bolivia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (14.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 13.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.16%), poverty (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and male poverty (9.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bolivia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bolivia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bolivia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.9%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.7%), and births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.67%), average family size (3.31 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (48.9% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bolivia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 27.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bolivia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.9%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and bachelor's degree (44.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 5th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and 6th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bolivia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 14.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (9.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.39%), disability (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.9%).