Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,329,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to a decrease of 4.1 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $62,083, a difference of 11.0%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($117,219 compared to $128,140, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($57,384 compared to $56,709, a difference of 1.2%), median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $70,146, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $71,567, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 20.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 17.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.80%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 6.7%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and family households (63.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.61%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 37.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 37.4%), professional degree (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.5%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.30%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and female disability (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.59%).