Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,282,031 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.187% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to an increase of 186.6 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,393 compared to $128,140, a difference of 19.3%), median household income ($94,399 compared to $111,519, a difference of 18.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $71,567, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 0.75%), median female earnings ($44,757 compared to $49,818, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $62,083, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 22.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 6.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.5%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (48.1% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 48.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.6%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.2%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.3% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.37%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.3%).