Kenyan vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,431,550 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Kenyan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.233. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kenyans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kenyans corresponds to a decrease of 23.9 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kenyan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,684 compared to $128,140, a difference of 39.8%), median household income ($84,085 compared to $111,519, a difference of 32.6%), and per capita income ($42,808 compared to $56,709, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 4.4%), householder income over 65 years ($60,514 compared to $71,567, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,815 compared to $62,083, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kenyan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 40.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 36.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kenyan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kenyan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 31.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kenyan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 44.0%), births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 35.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (63.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kenyan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 16.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.35%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kenyan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 45.5%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 42.4%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.20%), high school diploma (89.6% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kenyan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 33.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.7%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.8%).