Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,112,731 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.571. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($78,249 compared to $131,067, a difference of 67.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,701 compared to $128,140, a difference of 67.1%), and median household income ($68,461 compared to $111,519, a difference of 62.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 14.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $62,083, a difference of 23.2%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $49,818, a difference of 49.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 129.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 62.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.3%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (8.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 75.9%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 55.7%), and divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.13%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (68.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 29.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 135.8%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 88.4%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 78.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.16%), 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 37.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.8%).