Dutch West Indian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,371,961 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Dutch West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.658. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch West Indians corresponds to an increase of 48.8 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,260 compared to $128,140, a difference of 65.9%), median household income ($68,412 compared to $111,519, a difference of 63.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,171 compared to $127,500, a difference of 61.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,816 compared to $62,083, a difference of 35.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,475 compared to $71,567, a difference of 41.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 87.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 78.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 77.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and single father poverty (19.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 34.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 63.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 42.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 62.9%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 50.1%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.81%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (64.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.34%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 108.4%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 106.9%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 92.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.2% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.080%), 8th grade (95.4% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and 10th grade (92.6% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 104.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 90.6%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 74.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.8%).