Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Fair
Good
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,095,868 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.140. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.081% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 81.4 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,736 compared to $128,140, a difference of 47.7%), per capita income ($39,827 compared to $56,709, a difference of 42.4%), and median household income ($78,682 compared to $111,519, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 11.7%), householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $71,567, a difference of 25.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $62,083, a difference of 27.4%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Hong Kong
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Exceptional
$56,709
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Exceptional
$131,067
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Exceptional
$111,519
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Exceptional
$59,433
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Exceptional
$70,146
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Exceptional
$49,818
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Exceptional
$62,083
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Exceptional
$128,140
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Exceptional
$127,500
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Exceptional
$71,567
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Good
25.5%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 63.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 59.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 15.6%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Hong Kong
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
17.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
12.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
12.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
16.5%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
24.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.1%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.97%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Hong Kong
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 28.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.96%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Hong Kong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Tragic
30.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Tragic
71.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 45.8%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 39.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.98%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (62.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 5.7%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Hong Kong
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
66.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Exceptional
23.6%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
11.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Tragic
52.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Fair
19.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Good
6.5%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 62.3%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 61.9%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.50%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
94.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Average
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Exceptional
71.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
55.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
48.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
6.4%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.8%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 49.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 30.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.0%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.4%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Hong Kong
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
8.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Exceptional
19.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%