Panamanian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,412,707 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Panamanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.684. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Panamanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.178% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Panamanians corresponds to an increase of 177.9 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,193 compared to $128,140, a difference of 42.1%), median household income ($82,272 compared to $111,519, a difference of 35.5%), and per capita income ($42,035 compared to $56,709, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 4.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,611 compared to $62,083, a difference of 20.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,266 compared to $71,567, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 46.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 44.5%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 47.3%), births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 45.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.17%), family households (64.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 10.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 67.5%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 54.8%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.8% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 38.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.0%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.8%).