Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Trinidadians and Tobagonians

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Poor
Good
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Trinidadian and Tobagonian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,561,633 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.414. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to a decrease of 21.2 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Trinidadian and Tobagonian Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,856 compared to $128,140, a difference of 42.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,357 compared to $127,500, a difference of 39.6%), and median family income ($94,466 compared to $131,067, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,631 compared to $62,083, a difference of 18.0%), median female earnings ($40,958 compared to $49,818, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,327 compared to $71,567, a difference of 29.3%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
Income MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Hong Kong
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,655
Exceptional
$56,709
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,466
Exceptional
$131,067
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,402
Exceptional
$111,519
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,820
Exceptional
$59,433
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,446
Exceptional
$70,146
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,958
Exceptional
$49,818
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,631
Exceptional
$62,083
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,856
Exceptional
$128,140
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,357
Exceptional
$127,500
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,327
Exceptional
$71,567
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
19.3%
Good
25.5%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 75.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 58.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 13.7%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 21.5%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
Poverty MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Hong Kong
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Exceptional
17.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Exceptional
16.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Exceptional
24.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.0%
Exceptional
9.1%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.5%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Hong Kong
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
6.7%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.6%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.6%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.9%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.7%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.96%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Hong Kong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
30.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.5%
Tragic
71.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
83.6%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 59.6%), births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 54.7%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.9%), family households (63.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.4%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Hong Kong
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
66.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.9%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.5%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
23.6%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 110.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 52.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 16.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 40.7%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.7%
Tragic
11.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.3%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.9%
Tragic
52.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.6%
Fair
19.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.3%
Good
6.5%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 81.5%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 60.4%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (95.2% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and 4th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.040%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
Education Level MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Tragic
94.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.9%
Average
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
71.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
55.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.7%
Exceptional
48.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
6.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.8%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 33.8%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.7%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 11.5%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
Disability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Hong Kong
Disability
Average
11.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
23.9%
Exceptional
19.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.4%