Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,503,539 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.397. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to a decrease of 15.7 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $128,140, a difference of 32.3%), median male earnings ($56,243 compared to $70,146, a difference of 24.7%), and median household income ($89,640 compared to $111,519, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $71,567, a difference of 10.1%), median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $49,818, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $62,083, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (16.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 34.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 34.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.5%), single father poverty (13.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and single male poverty (11.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 25.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 34.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.4%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.32%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.67%), and family households (61.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.1%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.93%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.1%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and 5th grade (96.9% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 27.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.46%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.69%).