Mongolian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,782,580 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.468. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.258% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 257.7 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,578 compared to $128,140, a difference of 22.5%), median household income ($93,971 compared to $111,519, a difference of 18.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $62,083, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $71,567, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,602 compared to $127,500, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 29.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 25.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.60%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.8%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 18.4%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.15%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 16.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 0.49%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.7%), bachelor's degree (45.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.0% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.080%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.8% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.26%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.1%).