Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,703,727 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.092. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $128,140, a difference of 39.9%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $131,067, a difference of 37.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $127,500, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 11.4%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $62,083, a difference of 15.2%), and median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $49,818, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 63.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 57.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 9.6%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 39.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 39.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 48.8%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 41.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.92%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (65.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 101.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 45.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 13.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 25.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 36.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 90.2%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 63.5%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 28.2%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.9%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.9%).