Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,623,935 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Scotch-Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.548. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scotch-Irish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.247% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scotch-Irish corresponds to an increase of 246.7 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,969 compared to $128,140, a difference of 42.4%), median household income ($80,972 compared to $111,519, a difference of 37.7%), and median female earnings ($37,383 compared to $49,818, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 11.5%), householder income over 65 years ($59,447 compared to $71,567, a difference of 20.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,039 compared to $62,083, a difference of 26.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 46.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 42.5%), and single male poverty (14.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.6%), male poverty (11.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 45.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 35.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 36.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 41.1%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.7% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.30%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (64.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 66.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 86.3%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 49.0%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.8% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.16%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 80.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 58.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.1%).