Creek vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,458,126 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.468. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.159% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 158.9 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $128,140, a difference of 71.2%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $111,519, a difference of 64.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $127,500, a difference of 61.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 6.3%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $62,083, a difference of 36.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $71,567, a difference of 37.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 94.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 84.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 77.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 54.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 30.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 28.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 59.4%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 45.3%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.57%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (64.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 45.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 107.0%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 106.1%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 94.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 106.0%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 77.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 73.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.7%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.6%).