Paraguayan vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,621,738 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Paraguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Paraguayans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.031% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Paraguayans corresponds to a decrease of 31.3 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,615 compared to $128,140, a difference of 20.2%), median male earnings ($59,975 compared to $70,146, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,447 compared to $127,500, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($64,443 compared to $71,567, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,614 compared to $62,083, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 21.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 21.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 42.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.70%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 25.9%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.4%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (64.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.2%), no vehicles in household (14.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 27.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 25.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.3%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.5% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.21%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 108.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age over 75 (45.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 3.4%).