Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,658,555 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.220. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 4.8 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $128,140, a difference of 42.9%), median family income ($92,837 compared to $131,067, a difference of 41.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $127,500, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 13.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $62,083, a difference of 15.6%), and median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $49,818, a difference of 28.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 65.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 62.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 9.8%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 41.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 41.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 51.8%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 43.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.60%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (64.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 110.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 53.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 16.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 29.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 43.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 97.0%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 68.4%), and master's degree (13.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 28.3%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.5%).