French Canadian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,670,254 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.543. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 18.0 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $128,140, a difference of 36.8%), median household income ($82,810 compared to $111,519, a difference of 34.7%), and per capita income ($43,003 compared to $56,709, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 10.0%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $62,083, a difference of 17.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $71,567, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 42.7%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 39.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 10.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 46.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 45.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 43.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 45.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.2%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.8%), family households (63.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 44.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 80.2%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 59.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 98.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 57.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.2%).