Immigrants from Caribbean vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,680,437 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.529. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 3.5 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,326 compared to $128,140, a difference of 59.5%), median family income ($83,319 compared to $131,067, a difference of 57.3%), and median household income ($71,860 compared to $111,519, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $62,083, a difference of 22.3%), wage/income gap (20.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 25.2%), and median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $49,818, a difference of 36.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 115.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 72.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 71.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 9.6%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 21.8%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 42.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 40.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 73.2%), births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 68.9%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 73.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 10.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 18.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 31.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 116.6%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 80.8%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 69.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.24%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 36.5%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 9.5%).