Sierra Leonean vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,186,776 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Sierra Leonean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sierra Leoneans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sierra Leoneans corresponds to an increase of 43.9 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,435 compared to $128,140, a difference of 37.1%), per capita income ($43,405 compared to $56,709, a difference of 30.6%), and median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $70,146, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,272 compared to $62,083, a difference of 8.4%), householder income over 65 years ($65,038 compared to $71,567, a difference of 10.0%), and median female earnings ($42,868 compared to $49,818, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (17.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 44.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 44.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 38.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 60.0%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 47.8%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.30 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.32%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 42.4%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 41.8%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.15%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 34.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.4%).