Osage vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,485,079 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.987. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.337% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 336.7 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $128,140, a difference of 51.7%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $111,519, a difference of 48.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $127,500, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 6.0%), householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $71,567, a difference of 28.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $62,083, a difference of 35.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 58.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 58.0%), and single male poverty (16.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 63.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.97%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 27.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 36.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.0%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.39%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 30.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 73.3%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 67.2%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.15%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 93.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 76.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.2%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.8%).