Brazilian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,089,329 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.329. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 10.1 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,267 compared to $128,140, a difference of 30.4%), median household income ($88,934 compared to $111,519, a difference of 25.4%), and median male earnings ($56,837 compared to $70,146, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 4.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $62,083, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $71,567, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 31.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 28.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.13%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 23.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.2%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 28.9%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.41%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (63.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.6%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 31.1%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 53.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 37.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.040%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 6.8%).