Immigrants from Liberia vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,196,560 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to an increase of 9.1 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,863 compared to $128,140, a difference of 58.5%), median household income ($74,896 compared to $111,519, a difference of 48.9%), and per capita income ($38,165 compared to $56,709, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 24.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,981 compared to $62,083, a difference of 29.4%), and median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $49,818, a difference of 31.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 66.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 64.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.25%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 45.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 43.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 36.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 80.1%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 59.6%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (62.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 86.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 86.4%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and 5th grade (96.9% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 61.5%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 45.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.0%).