Immigrants from Eritrea vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,062,807 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Eritrea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eritrea within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eritrea corresponds to a decrease of 25.8 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,466 compared to $128,140, a difference of 37.1%), median household income ($85,025 compared to $111,519, a difference of 31.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,373 compared to $127,500, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 19.0%), householder income over 65 years ($60,096 compared to $71,567, a difference of 19.1%), and median female earnings ($41,485 compared to $49,818, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 53.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 52.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.0%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 26.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 39.1%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.8%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.83%), and family households (60.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 0.14%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 32.6%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.2%), and master's degree (16.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.7%).