Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,949,803 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Yugoslavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yugoslavians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yugoslavians corresponds to a decrease of 11.2 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,368 compared to $128,140, a difference of 40.3%), median household income ($82,186 compared to $111,519, a difference of 35.7%), and per capita income ($42,792 compared to $56,709, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 4.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,028 compared to $62,083, a difference of 21.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,243 compared to $71,567, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 38.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 31.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 37.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 30.8%), single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.5%), and currently married (47.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 25.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 60.2%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 56.0%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.29%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 43.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.71%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 7.1%).