Black/African American vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,575,581 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Black/African American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.553. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blacks/African Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blacks/African Americans corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Black/African American and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($73,370 compared to $128,140, a difference of 74.7%), median household income ($67,573 compared to $111,519, a difference of 65.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,556 compared to $127,500, a difference of 62.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 17.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,381 compared to $62,083, a difference of 39.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,779 compared to $71,567, a difference of 40.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Black/African American and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (25.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 106.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (24.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 101.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (24.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 100.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 14.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 23.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 37.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Black/African American and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 77.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 58.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Black/African American and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 19.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.8% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Black/African American and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (44.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 87.9%), single mother households (9.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 85.9%), and divorced or separated (13.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.47%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (61.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Black/African American and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.62%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.9% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Black/African American and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 92.3%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 88.4%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 69.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.090%), 9th grade (94.6% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Black/African American and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 79.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 57.3%), and vision disability (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 6.5%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and cognitive disability (19.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 18.8%).