Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Immigrants from Hong Kong
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Immigrants from Middle Africa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,140,948 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.180. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to a decrease of 12.2 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $128,140, a difference of 55.8%), median household income ($77,559 compared to $111,519, a difference of 43.8%), and per capita income ($39,529 compared to $56,709, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 14.1%), householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $71,567, a difference of 22.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $62,083, a difference of 29.6%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,529 | Exceptional $56,709 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $93,593 | Exceptional $131,067 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $77,559 | Exceptional $111,519 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $43,416 | Exceptional $59,433 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,201 | Exceptional $70,146 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,965 | Exceptional $49,818 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,916 | Exceptional $62,083 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,254 | Exceptional $128,140 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,293 | Exceptional $127,500 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,375 | Exceptional $71,567 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.4% | Good 25.5% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 58.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 56.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.10%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 9.8%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Families | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Males | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Single Males | Good 12.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Single Females | Tragic 22.3% | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 24.4% |
| Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Fair 11.1% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 39.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Good 5.2% |
| Males | Tragic 5.5% | Good 5.2% |
| Females | Fair 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
| Youth < 25 | Tragic 11.9% | Average 11.6% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Good 17.4% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Poor 10.5% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.6% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Average 4.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.0% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.1% | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 31.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.7% | Exceptional 65.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 80.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Tragic 30.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.6% | Tragic 71.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 85.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 59.7%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 48.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.23%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (61.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.9%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Family Households | Tragic 61.9% | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Good 27.5% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Exceptional 49.6% |
| Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 43.0% | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.9% | Exceptional 23.6% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.9%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.1%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Tragic 11.3% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Tragic 88.7% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.4% | Tragic 52.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Fair 19.2% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Good 6.5% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 52.4%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 46.6%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.2% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.090%), 5th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and 6th grade (96.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.4% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.2% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Tragic 96.9% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 96.7% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Tragic 96.3% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Tragic 95.2% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Tragic 94.9% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Tragic 94.1% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 92.9% | Tragic 93.1% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 91.6% | Fair 92.2% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Good 91.3% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Average 89.3% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.4% | Exceptional 86.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Poor 63.9% | Exceptional 71.0% |
| College, 1 year or more | Poor 58.0% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Poor 44.7% | Exceptional 55.4% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.6% | Exceptional 48.2% |
| Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 20.5% |
| Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Exceptional 6.4% |
| Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 38.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.8%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Disability | Good 11.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Males | Good 11.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 0.95% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.1% | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.1% | Exceptional 46.5% |
| Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |