Australian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,203,049 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.555. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.199% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 199.3 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $128,140, a difference of 18.7%), median household income ($96,490 compared to $111,519, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $62,083, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $71,567, a difference of 7.0%), per capita income ($52,074 compared to $56,709, a difference of 8.9%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 24.7%), single female poverty (20.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 23.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.9%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and male poverty (10.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 24.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 25.3%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.3%), currently married (47.6% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 12.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 67.1%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.8%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (70.4% compared to 71.0%, a difference of 0.89%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 45.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 7.1%).