Latvian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,125,646 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.702. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.234% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 234.3 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $128,140, a difference of 17.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $62,083, a difference of 17.6%), and median household income ($97,311 compared to $111,519, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $71,567, a difference of 6.3%), per capita income ($52,649 compared to $56,709, a difference of 7.7%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $131,067, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.3%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.10%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and poverty (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 27.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 17.6%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.87%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.66%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 75.3%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and bachelor's degree (46.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (66.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.59%), college, under 1 year (71.6% compared to 71.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 38.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 31.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.0%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.1%).