Lumbee vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lumbee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lumbee

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Poor
Good
2,002
SOCIAL INDEX
17.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
276th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Lumbee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,135,718 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.118% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 118.2 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Lumbee Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $128,140, a difference of 112.5%), median household income ($54,644 compared to $111,519, a difference of 104.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($65,113 compared to $127,500, a difference of 95.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 19.7%), median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $49,818, a difference of 53.3%), and median earnings ($36,876 compared to $59,433, a difference of 61.2%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
Income MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Hong Kong
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$29,845
Exceptional
$56,709
Median Family Income
Tragic
$68,679
Exceptional
$131,067
Median Household Income
Tragic
$54,644
Exceptional
$111,519
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,876
Exceptional
$59,433
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$41,715
Exceptional
$70,146
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,500
Exceptional
$49,818
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$34,584
Exceptional
$62,083
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$60,305
Exceptional
$128,140
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$65,113
Exceptional
$127,500
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$40,550
Exceptional
$71,567
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.3%
Good
25.5%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (33.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 167.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 160.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (31.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 155.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 53.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (18.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 63.7%), and married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 76.7%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
Poverty MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Hong Kong
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.1%
Exceptional
17.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
12.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
30.7%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Single Females
Tragic
33.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
28.5%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
24.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
18.1%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
9.1%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 138.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 79.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 76.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.8%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Hong Kong
Unemployment
Tragic
6.4%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
6.9%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.1%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.6%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.7%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (70.6% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 9.3%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Hong Kong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
56.8%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.6%
Exceptional
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
30.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
65.5%
Tragic
71.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
78.3%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.0%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.6%
Exceptional
83.6%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 104.4%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 88.2%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and family households (63.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.9%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Hong Kong
Family Households
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
66.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.3%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.6%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.8%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
23.6%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 9.4%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.3%
Tragic
11.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.9%
Tragic
52.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.1%
Fair
19.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Good
6.5%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 160.3%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 154.7%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 120.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.4% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.24%), 8th grade (96.0% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
Education Level MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Tragic
94.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.9%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.7%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.6%
Average
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
54.2%
Exceptional
71.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
48.9%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
55.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.8%
Exceptional
48.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
6.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.1%
Exceptional
2.8%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 115.3%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 87.6%), and ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 78.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 19.4%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 21.0%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.1%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
Disability MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Hong Kong
Disability
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Males
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.7%
Exceptional
19.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.2%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.4%