Immigrants from Cambodia vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 153,803,689 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.510. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.059% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to a decrease of 59.4 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,434 compared to $56,709, a difference of 40.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,533 compared to $128,140, a difference of 40.0%), and median male earnings ($51,594 compared to $70,146, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 9.7%), householder income under 25 years ($52,450 compared to $62,083, a difference of 18.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,580 compared to $71,567, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 52.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 47.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 4.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 20.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 49.5%), births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 47.5%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.0%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 81.5%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 75.8%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.85%), 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.85%), and nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 46.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 37.1%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.6%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.2%).