Arapaho vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,035,099 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.431. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 46.9 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $128,140, a difference of 78.7%), per capita income ($32,345 compared to $56,709, a difference of 75.3%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $70,146, a difference of 68.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 8.8%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $71,567, a difference of 20.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $62,083, a difference of 41.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 110.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 86.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 76.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 37.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 229.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 154.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 144.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 22.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 99.8%), single father households (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 58.4%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.51%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.26, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 53.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 44.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 38.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 137.8%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 122.9%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 104.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.14%), high school diploma (88.6% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.76%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 83.7%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 56.0%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 10.3%).