Immigrants from Zaire vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,028,520 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Zaire communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.311. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zaire within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zaire corresponds to an increase of 17.1 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,045 compared to $128,140, a difference of 64.2%), median household income ($71,801 compared to $111,519, a difference of 55.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,207 compared to $127,500, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 14.4%), householder income over 65 years ($54,512 compared to $71,567, a difference of 31.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,529 compared to $62,083, a difference of 36.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 71.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 65.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 64.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 26.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 33.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 53.1%), births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 46.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (59.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.11%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 43.9%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.1%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 40.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.2%).