Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from the Azores
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from the Azores

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Poor
Good
1,552
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
302nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Immigrants from the Azores Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,361,333 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from the Azores communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.464. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from the Azores within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.121% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from the Azores corresponds to a decrease of 121.2 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Immigrants from the Azores Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,608 compared to $56,709, a difference of 43.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,322 compared to $128,140, a difference of 38.8%), and median household income ($80,357 compared to $111,519, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,621 compared to $62,083, a difference of 18.0%), and median female earnings ($38,573 compared to $49,818, a difference of 29.1%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
Income MetricImmigrants from the AzoresImmigrants from Hong Kong
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,608
Exceptional
$56,709
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,402
Exceptional
$131,067
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,357
Exceptional
$111,519
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,812
Exceptional
$59,433
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,503
Exceptional
$70,146
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,573
Exceptional
$49,818
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,621
Exceptional
$62,083
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,322
Exceptional
$128,140
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,138
Exceptional
$127,500
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,121
Exceptional
$71,567
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Good
25.5%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 80.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 54.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.6%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.6%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from the AzoresImmigrants from Hong Kong
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Tragic
10.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
17.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
12.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Single Females
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
16.5%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.2%
Exceptional
24.4%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.9%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
9.1%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 59.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 39.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and female unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.6%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from the AzoresImmigrants from Hong Kong
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
6.4%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.7%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 36.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from the AzoresImmigrants from Hong Kong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.8%
Exceptional
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Tragic
30.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Tragic
71.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.5%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.1%
Exceptional
83.6%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 67.8%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 55.8%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.77%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from the AzoresImmigrants from Hong Kong
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
66.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.1%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.6%
Exceptional
23.6%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 16.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 12.0%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from the AzoresImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
11.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.4%
Tragic
52.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Fair
19.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.5%
Good
6.5%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 126.7%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 105.0%), and master's degree (10.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 100.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from the AzoresImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Tragic
94.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.2%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.3%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.8%
Average
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
54.7%
Exceptional
71.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
35.6%
Exceptional
55.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
48.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
6.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.8%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 136.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 74.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 9.6%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.0%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from the AzoresImmigrants from Hong Kong
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
8.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
19.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.9%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.4%