Immigrants from Albania vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,282,646 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Albania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Albania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Albania corresponds to a decrease of 11.9 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Albania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,929 compared to $128,140, a difference of 30.8%), median household income ($86,534 compared to $111,519, a difference of 28.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,957 compared to $127,500, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 6.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,597 compared to $62,083, a difference of 15.8%), and median female earnings ($42,388 compared to $49,818, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Albania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 43.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 31.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Albania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Albania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Albania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 25.2%), births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 19.0%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.0%), single father households (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and family households (62.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Albania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 57.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 37.3%), and no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (46.0% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Albania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 45.6%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 32.8%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.0%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Albania and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.38%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 7.4%).