Japanese vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,534,782 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.462. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to a decrease of 15.2 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,870 compared to $56,709, a difference of 42.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,624 compared to $128,140, a difference of 39.9%), and median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $70,146, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 7.3%), householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $62,083, a difference of 18.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,919 compared to $71,567, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 55.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 45.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.8%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 23.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 53.1%), single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 50.2%), and births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.38%), average family size (3.35 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (29.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 19.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 82.7%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 80.6%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 63.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (96.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.68%), nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.69%), and kindergarten (96.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 50.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 40.9%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 8.1%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.0%).