Immigrants from Japan vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,266,882 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Japan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Japan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Japan corresponds to an increase of 40.6 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,228 compared to $128,140, a difference of 14.2%), householder income under 25 years ($55,932 compared to $62,083, a difference of 11.0%), and median household income ($100,711 compared to $111,519, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,774 compared to $71,567, a difference of 2.6%), per capita income ($53,359 compared to $56,709, a difference of 6.3%), and median family income ($122,764 compared to $131,067, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 13.4%), single female poverty (18.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.2%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and male poverty (10.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.74%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 12.0%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (48.0% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 4.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.10%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 45.6%), bachelor's degree (46.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and master's degree (20.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (66.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.35%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.30%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.1%).