Portuguese vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 241,443,435 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.332. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 4.7 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $128,140, a difference of 28.9%), per capita income ($44,362 compared to $56,709, a difference of 27.8%), and median household income ($88,976 compared to $111,519, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 7.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $62,083, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $71,567, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 34.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 32.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 36.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 31.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 43.5%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.0%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.35%), family households (65.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 31.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 58.4%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 57.7%), and master's degree (13.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.0% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.25%), 10th grade (93.3% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 70.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.9%).