Israeli vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,189,635 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Israeli communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.156. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Israelis within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Israelis corresponds to a decrease of 20.7 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,579 compared to $128,140, a difference of 19.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,335 compared to $62,083, a difference of 18.6%), and median household income ($96,552 compared to $111,519, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 7.3%), householder income over 65 years ($66,636 compared to $71,567, a difference of 7.4%), and per capita income ($52,596 compared to $56,709, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 33.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 29.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.6% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 21.3%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.5%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.25%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.96%), and family households (63.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and no vehicles in household (12.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and no vehicles in household (12.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 41.1%), professional degree (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and bachelor's degree (46.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.55%), master's degree (20.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 18.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.12%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.3%).