Asian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,969,117 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.720. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to an increase of 26.7 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $128,140, a difference of 13.7%), per capita income ($50,057 compared to $56,709, a difference of 13.3%), and median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $49,818, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $71,567, a difference of 4.0%), wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $127,500, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 12.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%), single father poverty (14.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.87%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.6%), single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.5% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 0.34%), family households (66.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.56%), and average family size (3.28 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 26.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.3%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.11%), high school diploma (89.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 14.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.0%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and female disability (10.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.8%).