Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Immigrants from Hong Kong
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,485,931 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.333. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to an increase of 9.0 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 14.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($116,626 compared to $128,140, a difference of 9.9%), and per capita income ($52,660 compared to $56,709, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $70,146, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $71,567, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($124,188 compared to $127,500, a difference of 2.7%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,660 | Exceptional $56,709 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,956 | Exceptional $131,067 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $106,057 | Exceptional $111,519 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $57,114 | Exceptional $59,433 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $68,960 | Exceptional $70,146 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,324 | Exceptional $49,818 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,818 | Exceptional $62,083 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $116,626 | Exceptional $128,140 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $124,188 | Exceptional $127,500 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $70,103 | Exceptional $71,567 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.3% | Good 25.5% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 13.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.70%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and female poverty (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.99%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Poverty | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.3% | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.6% | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 17.8% | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 25.3% | Exceptional 24.4% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Fair 11.1% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 12.8% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Good 5.2% |
| Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
| Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Average 11.6% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Good 17.4% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Poor 10.5% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.2% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Excellent 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 65.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.6% | Tragic 30.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.0% | Tragic 71.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.6%), family households with children (30.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.41%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.93%), and married-couple households (50.6% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Family Households | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 30.0% | Good 27.5% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.6% | Exceptional 49.6% |
| Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 50.0% | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 23.6% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 32.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.92%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 11.3% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.5% | Tragic 88.7% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.6% | Tragic 52.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Fair 19.2% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Good 6.5% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.6%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (48.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.28%), associate's degree (55.7% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.70%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Tragic 2.7% |
| Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.4% |
| Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Tragic 97.2% |
| 3rd Grade | Good 97.8% | Tragic 97.1% |
| 4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Tragic 96.9% |
| 5th Grade | Good 97.5% | Tragic 96.7% |
| 6th Grade | Good 97.2% | Tragic 96.3% |
| 7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Tragic 95.2% |
| 8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Tragic 94.9% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 94.1% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Tragic 93.1% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Fair 92.2% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Good 91.3% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Average 89.3% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.4% | Exceptional 86.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 72.1% | Exceptional 71.0% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.7% | Exceptional 55.4% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.3% | Exceptional 48.2% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.7% | Exceptional 20.5% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 6.4% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 10.3%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.060%), disability (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.84%), and disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Disability | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Exceptional 0.95% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.6% | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.0% | Exceptional 46.5% |
| Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.4% |