Spaniard vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 238,633,331 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Spaniard communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.454. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Spaniards within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Spaniards corresponds to a decrease of 11.5 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,366 compared to $128,140, a difference of 37.2%), per capita income ($43,028 compared to $56,709, a difference of 31.8%), and median household income ($84,644 compared to $111,519, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income over 65 years ($60,866 compared to $71,567, a difference of 17.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,117 compared to $62,083, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 45.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 40.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 24.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 42.5%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.7%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.99%), family households (65.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 35.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 47.9%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 45.0%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.23%), 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 49.5%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 43.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.5%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.2%).