Filipino vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Filipino
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Filipinos

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Exceptional
Good
9,951
SOCIAL INDEX
97.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
5th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Filipino Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,008,729 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.704. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.373% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 373.1 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Filipino Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

Filipino vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 16.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $62,083, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($76,686 compared to $71,567, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $128,140, a difference of 0.45%), median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $49,818, a difference of 0.63%), and median earnings ($61,197 compared to $59,433, a difference of 3.0%).
Filipino vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
Income MetricFilipinoImmigrants from Hong Kong
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$59,066
Exceptional
$56,709
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$138,397
Exceptional
$131,067
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$115,509
Exceptional
$111,519
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$61,197
Exceptional
$59,433
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$74,224
Exceptional
$70,146
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,508
Exceptional
$49,818
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,740
Exceptional
$62,083
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,723
Exceptional
$128,140
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$134,910
Exceptional
$127,500
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$76,686
Exceptional
$71,567
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.7%
Good
25.5%

Filipino vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 22.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (24.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 0.23%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and single father poverty (14.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Filipino vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
Poverty MetricFilipinoImmigrants from Hong Kong
Poverty
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
17.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.0%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.3%
Exceptional
24.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
9.1%

Filipino vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
Filipino vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFilipinoImmigrants from Hong Kong
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%

Filipino vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.46%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Filipino vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFilipinoImmigrants from Hong Kong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
30.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.4%
Tragic
71.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Exceptional
83.6%

Filipino vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.7%), single mother households (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple households (51.0% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.36%), divorced or separated (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.56%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Filipino vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFilipinoImmigrants from Hong Kong
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
66.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
51.0%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.7%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
23.6%

Filipino vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 10.0%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.5%).
Filipino vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFilipinoImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
11.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
52.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.8%
Fair
19.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Good
6.5%

Filipino vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 37.5%), doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.8%), and professional degree (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.76%).
Filipino vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
Education Level MetricFilipinoImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
94.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Average
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.5%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
75.5%
Exceptional
71.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
71.0%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
55.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
52.7%
Exceptional
48.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
23.4%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.4%
Exceptional
2.8%

Filipino vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 11.2%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and ambulatory disability (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.1%).
Filipino vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
Disability MetricFilipinoImmigrants from Hong Kong
Disability
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Males
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
19.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.4%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.4%