Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Tragic
Good
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,347,728 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.804. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.053% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 53.0 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $56,709, a difference of 87.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($69,068 compared to $128,140, a difference of 85.5%), and median family income ($72,193 compared to $131,067, a difference of 81.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 15.3%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $62,083, a difference of 37.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $71,567, a difference of 45.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Hong Kong
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$56,709
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$131,067
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$111,519
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$59,433
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$70,146
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Exceptional
$49,818
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$62,083
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Exceptional
$128,140
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$127,500
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$71,567
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Good
25.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 181.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (31.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 161.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 157.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 49.0%), single father poverty (22.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 54.5%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 76.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Hong Kong
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
17.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
12.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
16.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
24.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
9.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 95.0%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 93.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 92.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 18.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Hong Kong
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Hong Kong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
30.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Tragic
71.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 111.5%), single father households (3.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 108.7%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 88.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.53 compared to 3.26, a difference of 8.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Hong Kong
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
66.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
23.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 38.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
11.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Tragic
52.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Fair
19.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Good
6.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 125.2%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 110.7%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 97.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.0% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.17%), 6th grade (96.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and 5th grade (97.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.32%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Tragic
94.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Average
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
71.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
55.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
48.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
6.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 131.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 104.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 81.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 20.3%), disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 22.1%), and self-care disability (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Hong Kong
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
19.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.4%