Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Excellent
Good
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,262,427 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.661. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.215% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 214.9 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Luxembourger Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $128,140, a difference of 31.8%), median household income ($86,418 compared to $111,519, a difference of 29.0%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $49,818, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 7.4%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $71,567, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $127,500, a difference of 23.2%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Hong Kong
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Exceptional
$56,709
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Exceptional
$131,067
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Exceptional
$111,519
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Exceptional
$59,433
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Exceptional
$70,146
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Exceptional
$49,818
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Exceptional
$62,083
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Exceptional
$128,140
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Exceptional
$127,500
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Exceptional
$71,567
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Good
25.5%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 27.8%), single female poverty (20.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.48%), male poverty (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.48%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Hong Kong
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
17.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
12.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
12.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Exceptional
16.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
24.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.1%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Hong Kong
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 48.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.95%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Hong Kong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Exceptional
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Tragic
30.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
71.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 24.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.3% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.78%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Hong Kong
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
66.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Exceptional
23.6%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 111.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 9.0%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
11.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
52.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Fair
19.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Good
6.5%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 70.2%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 43.2%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Average
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
71.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
55.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Exceptional
48.2%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
2.8%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 39.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 31.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.7%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Hong Kong
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Exceptional
19.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.4%