Swiss vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 235,929,958 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.059. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,511 compared to $128,140, a difference of 34.2%), median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $49,818, a difference of 31.4%), and median household income ($85,681 compared to $111,519, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $71,567, a difference of 16.1%), wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $62,083, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 31.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 29.9%), and single female poverty (21.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.4%), male poverty (10.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 42.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 29.3%), single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.3%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.47%), married-couple households (49.9% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and family households (65.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 44.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 20.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 76.9%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 43.1%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.0% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.070%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 72.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 41.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.63%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 4.1%).