Inupiat vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Inupiat
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Inupiat

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Fair
Good
2,695
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
244th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Inupiat Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,007,064 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Inupiat communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Inupiat within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Inupiat corresponds to an increase of 46.0 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Inupiat Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

Inupiat vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,999 compared to $56,709, a difference of 53.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,619 compared to $128,140, a difference of 51.4%), and median male earnings ($47,281 compared to $70,146, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,935 compared to $62,083, a difference of 11.0%), householder income over 65 years ($61,061 compared to $71,567, a difference of 17.2%), and wage/income gap (20.8% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 22.9%).
Inupiat vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
Income MetricInupiatImmigrants from Hong Kong
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,999
Exceptional
$56,709
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,730
Exceptional
$131,067
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,841
Exceptional
$111,519
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,000
Exceptional
$59,433
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,281
Exceptional
$70,146
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,080
Exceptional
$49,818
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,935
Exceptional
$62,083
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,619
Exceptional
$128,140
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,355
Exceptional
$127,500
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,061
Exceptional
$71,567
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.8%
Good
25.5%

Inupiat vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 120.6%), single male poverty (20.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 91.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 78.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 19.1%).
Inupiat vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
Poverty MetricInupiatImmigrants from Hong Kong
Poverty
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
17.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Tragic
20.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
16.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Good
29.0%
Exceptional
24.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.6%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
20.1%
Exceptional
9.1%

Inupiat vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (17.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 206.0%), male unemployment (12.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 130.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 114.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (7.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.8%).
Inupiat vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricInupiatImmigrants from Hong Kong
Unemployment
Tragic
10.1%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
8.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
22.0%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
28.1%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
9.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.5%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
4.7%

Inupiat vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 4.7%).
Inupiat vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricInupiatImmigrants from Hong Kong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.1%
Exceptional
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.0%
Tragic
30.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.6%
Tragic
71.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
79.8%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.7%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.9%
Exceptional
83.6%

Inupiat vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 165.4%), births to unmarried women (52.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 121.0%), and single mother households (8.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 75.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.5%), average family size (3.63 compared to 3.26, a difference of 11.3%), and divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.6%).
Inupiat vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricInupiatImmigrants from Hong Kong
Family Households
Exceptional
67.8%
Exceptional
66.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
32.8%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.4%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.63
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.3%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
52.1%
Exceptional
23.6%

Inupiat vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 164.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (71.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 24.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (42.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 13.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (42.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 23.3%).
Inupiat vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricInupiatImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
29.9%
Tragic
11.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
71.5%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
52.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.9%
Fair
19.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Good
6.5%

Inupiat vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 112.3%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 102.4%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 94.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.20%), high school diploma (88.5% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.85%), and 10th grade (94.4% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Inupiat vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
Education Level MetricInupiatImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.9%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.9%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Tragic
94.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Average
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
54.6%
Exceptional
71.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.2%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.6%
Exceptional
55.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
48.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.8%

Inupiat vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (3.7% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 291.9%), hearing disability (4.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 77.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (34.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 73.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.1%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.3%).
Inupiat vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
Disability MetricInupiatImmigrants from Hong Kong
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
19.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
58.4%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.4%