Cuban vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,424,262 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.538. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,483 compared to $128,140, a difference of 57.3%), median family income ($84,981 compared to $131,067, a difference of 54.2%), and median household income ($73,392 compared to $111,519, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 9.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $62,083, a difference of 22.6%), and median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $49,818, a difference of 42.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 100.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 53.3%), and family poverty (10.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.6%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 67.1%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 48.9%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.25%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (67.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 32.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.73%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 101.5%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 69.4%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and 6th grade (96.2% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 31.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.0%).